x86/vdso: Fix gettimeofday masking

Because of how the virtual clocks use U64_MAX as an exception value
instead of a valid time, the clocks can no longer be assumed to wrap
cleanly. This is then compounded by arch_vdso_cycles_ok() rejecting
everything with the MSB/Sign-bit set.

Therefore, the effective mask becomes S64_MAX, and the comment with
vdso_calc_delta() that states the mask is U64_MAX and isn't optimized
out is just plain silly.

Now, the code has a negative filter -- to deal with TSC wobbles:

	if (cycles > last)

which is just plain wrong, because it should've been written as:

	if ((s64)(cycles - last) > 0)

to take wrapping into account, but per all the above, we don't
actually wrap on u64 anymore.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>  # Hyper-V
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230519102715.704767397@infradead.org
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-19 12:21:06 +02:00
parent fc4a0db414
commit 77750f78b0

View File

@@ -231,14 +231,17 @@ static u64 vread_pvclock(void)
ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(pvti, rdtsc_ordered());
} while (pvclock_read_retry(pvti, version));
return ret;
return ret & S64_MAX;
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TIMER
static u64 vread_hvclock(void)
{
return hv_read_tsc_page(&hvclock_page);
u64 ret = hv_read_tsc_page(&hvclock_page);
if (likely(ret != U64_MAX))
ret &= S64_MAX;
return ret;
}
#endif
@@ -246,7 +249,7 @@ static inline u64 __arch_get_hw_counter(s32 clock_mode,
const struct vdso_data *vd)
{
if (likely(clock_mode == VDSO_CLOCKMODE_TSC))
return (u64)rdtsc_ordered();
return (u64)rdtsc_ordered() & S64_MAX;
/*
* For any memory-mapped vclock type, we need to make sure that gcc
* doesn't cleverly hoist a load before the mode check. Otherwise we
@@ -284,6 +287,9 @@ static inline bool arch_vdso_clocksource_ok(const struct vdso_data *vd)
* which can be invalidated asynchronously and indicate invalidation by
* returning U64_MAX, which can be effectively tested by checking for a
* negative value after casting it to s64.
*
* This effectively forces a S64_MAX mask on the calculations, unlike the
* U64_MAX mask normally used by x86 clocksources.
*/
static inline bool arch_vdso_cycles_ok(u64 cycles)
{
@@ -303,18 +309,29 @@ static inline bool arch_vdso_cycles_ok(u64 cycles)
* @last. If not then use @last, which is the base time of the current
* conversion period.
*
* This variant also removes the masking of the subtraction because the
* clocksource mask of all VDSO capable clocksources on x86 is U64_MAX
* which would result in a pointless operation. The compiler cannot
* optimize it away as the mask comes from the vdso data and is not compile
* time constant.
* This variant also uses a custom mask because while the clocksource mask of
* all the VDSO capable clocksources on x86 is U64_MAX, the above code uses
* U64_MASK as an exception value, additionally arch_vdso_cycles_ok() above
* declares everything with the MSB/Sign-bit set as invalid. Therefore the
* effective mask is S64_MAX.
*/
static __always_inline
u64 vdso_calc_delta(u64 cycles, u64 last, u64 mask, u32 mult)
{
if (cycles > last)
return (cycles - last) * mult;
return 0;
/*
* Due to the MSB/Sign-bit being used as invald marker (see
* arch_vdso_cycles_valid() above), the effective mask is S64_MAX.
*/
u64 delta = (cycles - last) & S64_MAX;
/*
* Due to the above mentioned TSC wobbles, filter out negative motion.
* Per the above masking, the effective sign bit is now bit 62.
*/
if (unlikely(delta & (1ULL << 62)))
return 0;
return delta * mult;
}
#define vdso_calc_delta vdso_calc_delta