All manipulation of bd_openers is under disk->open_mutex and will remain
so for the foreseeable future. But at least one place reads it without
the lock (blkdev_get) and there are more to be added. So make sure the
compiler does not do turn the increments and decrements into non-atomic
sequences by using an atomic_t.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330052917.2566582-6-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
As Luis reported, losetup currently doesn't properly create the loop
device without this if the device node already exists because old
scripts created it manually. So default to y for now and remove the
aggressive removal schedule.
Reported-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220225181440.1351591-1-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
disk->fops->owner is grabbed in blkdev_get_no_open() after the disk
kobject refcount is increased. This way can't make sure that
disk->fops->owner is still alive since del_gendisk() still can move
on if the kobject refcount of disk is grabbed by open() and
disk->fops->open() isn't called yet.
Fixes the issue by moving try_module_get() into blkdev_get_by_dev()
with ->open_mutex() held, then we can drain the in-progress open()
in del_gendisk(). Meantime new open() won't succeed because disk
becomes not alive.
This way is reasonable because blkdev_get_no_open() needn't to touch
disk->fops or defined callbacks.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: czhong@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211111020343.316126-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>