PM: EM: Mark inefficient states

Some SoCs, such as the sd855 have OPPs within the same performance domain,
whose cost is higher than others with a higher frequency. Even though
those OPPs are interesting from a cooling perspective, it makes no sense
to use them when the device can run at full capacity. Those OPPs handicap
the performance domain, when choosing the most energy-efficient CPU and
are wasting energy. They are inefficient.

Hence, add support for such OPPs to the Energy Model. The table can now
be read skipping inefficient performance states (and by extension,
inefficient OPPs).

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vincent Donnefort
2021-09-08 15:05:23 +01:00
committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent aa1a43262a
commit c8ed99533d
2 changed files with 15 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -17,13 +17,25 @@
* device). It can be a total power: static and dynamic.
* @cost: The cost coefficient associated with this level, used during
* energy calculation. Equal to: power * max_frequency / frequency
* @flags: see "em_perf_state flags" description below.
*/
struct em_perf_state {
unsigned long frequency;
unsigned long power;
unsigned long cost;
unsigned long flags;
};
/*
* em_perf_state flags:
*
* EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT: The performance state is inefficient. There is
* in this em_perf_domain, another performance state with a higher frequency
* but a lower or equal power cost. Such inefficient states are ignored when
* using em_pd_get_efficient_*() functions.
*/
#define EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT BIT(0)
/**
* struct em_perf_domain - Performance domain
* @table: List of performance states, in ascending order