mirror of
https://github.com/lkl/linux.git
synced 2025-12-19 16:13:19 +09:00
seccomp,x86,arm,mips,s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing
The secure_computing function took a syscall number parameter, but it only paid any attention to that parameter if seccomp mode 1 was enabled. Rather than coming up with a kludge to get the parameter to work in mode 2, just remove the parameter. To avoid churn in arches that don't have seccomp filters (and may not even support syscall_get_nr right now), this leaves the parameter in secure_computing_strict, which is now a real function. For ARM, this is a bit ugly due to the fact that ARM conditionally supports seccomp filters. Fixing that would probably only be a couple of lines of code, but it should be coordinated with the audit maintainers. This will be a slight slowdown on some arches. The right fix is to pass in all of seccomp_data instead of trying to make just the syscall nr part be fast. This is a prerequisite for making two-phase seccomp work cleanly. Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Kees Cook
parent
70c8038dd6
commit
a4412fc948
@@ -27,19 +27,17 @@ struct seccomp {
|
||||
struct seccomp_filter *filter;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
extern int __secure_computing(int);
|
||||
static inline int secure_computing(int this_syscall)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
extern int __secure_computing(void);
|
||||
static inline int secure_computing(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP)))
|
||||
return __secure_computing(this_syscall);
|
||||
return __secure_computing();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* A wrapper for architectures supporting only SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT. */
|
||||
static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BUG_ON(secure_computing(this_syscall) != 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
extern void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
extern long prctl_get_seccomp(void);
|
||||
extern long prctl_set_seccomp(unsigned long, char __user *);
|
||||
@@ -56,8 +54,11 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
|
||||
struct seccomp { };
|
||||
struct seccomp_filter { };
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int secure_computing(int this_syscall) { return 0; }
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static inline long prctl_get_seccomp(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user