aleph/lkl_linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/lkl/linux.git synced 2025-12-19 08:03:01 +09:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'

Browse Source 
Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they
are not issued from root group. This is because
'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in
bfq_asymmetric_scenario().

The way that bfqg is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs':

Before this patch:
 1) root group will never be counted.
 2) Count if bfqg or it's child bfqgs have pending requests.
 3) Don't count if bfqg and it's child bfqgs complete all the requests.

After this patch:
 1) root group is counted.
 2) Count if bfqg have pending requests.
 3) Don't count if bfqg complete all the requests.

With this change, the occasion that only one group is activated can be
detected, and next patch will support concurrent sync io in the
occasion.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 15:19:39 +08:00
committed by Jens Axboe
parent 60a6e10c53
commit 71f8ca77cb
3 changed files with 17 additions and 66 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
block/bfq-wf2q.c
View File

@@ -984,19 +984,6 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
entity->on_st_or_in_serv = true;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity)) { /* bfq_group */
struct bfq_group *bfqg =
container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity);
struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {
entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs = true;
bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs++;
}
}
#endif
bfq_update_fin_time_enqueue(entity, st, backshifted);
}
@@ -1653,7 +1640,8 @@ void bfq_add_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {
entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs = true;
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
bfqq_group(bfqq)->num_queues_with_pending_reqs++;
if (!(bfqq_group(bfqq)->num_queues_with_pending_reqs++))
bfqq->bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs++;
#endif
}
}
@@ -1665,7 +1653,8 @@ void bfq_del_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
if (entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {
entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs = false;
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
bfqq_group(bfqq)->num_queues_with_pending_reqs--;
if (!(--bfqq_group(bfqq)->num_queues_with_pending_reqs))
bfqq->bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs--;
#endif
}
}
@@ -1694,6 +1683,10 @@ void bfq_del_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool expiration)
if (!bfqq->dispatched) {
bfq_del_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(bfqq);
/*
* Next function is invoked last, because it causes bfqq to be
* freed. DO NOT use bfqq after the next function invocation.
*/
bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq);
}
}